DRP-317 Buff Berea Notebook Report¶
Notebook: 24_mwe_drp317_buffberea_raw_porosity_perm
Sources¶
- Dataset: Neumann, R., ANDREETA, M., Lucas-Oliveira, E. (2020, October 7). 11 Sandstones: raw, filtered and segmented data [Dataset]. Digital Porous Media Portal. https://www.doi.org/10.17612/f4h1-w124
- Experimental reference paper: Neumann, R. F., Barsi-Andreeta, M., Lucas-Oliveira, E., Barbalho, H., Trevizan, W. A., Bonagamba, T. J., & Steiner, M. B. (2021). High accuracy capillary network representation in digital rock reveals permeability scaling functions. Scientific Reports, 11, 11370. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90090-0
Current Setup¶
- Raw volume:
BB_2d25um_binary.raw - ROI size:
300 x 300 x 300voxels - Selected ROI origin:
(700, 700, 350) - Conductance model:
generic_poiseuille - Viscosity model: tabulated water viscosity from
thermo,298.15 K - Boundary pressures:
pout = 5.0 MPa,pin = pout + 10 kPa/m * L
Key Results¶
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| Experimental porosity [%] | 24.02 |
| Full-image porosity [%] | 22.71 |
| ROI porosity [%] | 22.82 |
| Network absolute porosity [%] | 23.40 |
| Experimental permeability [mD] | 275.0 |
| Kx [mD] | 390.44 |
| Ky [mD] | 314.58 |
| Kz [mD] | 206.55 |
| Arithmetic mean permeability [mD] | 303.86 |
| Quadratic-mean permeability [mD] | 313.09 |
| Relative quadratic-mean error [%] | 13.85 |

Interpretation¶
The current workflow predicts Buff Berea with a quadratic-mean permeability error of
13.85% relative to the Table 1 experimental reference.
This case should be interpreted together with the cross-sample summary in
DRP-317 sandstone validation overview.